ZTree.com  | ZEN  | About...  

 Index   Back

MB instead of KB view.   [General]

By: Ramon Ebdon       
Date: Sep 30,2003 at 13:37
In Response to: MB instead of KB view. (Michael Kahn)

> If I have mb, then I don't care about Kbytes. If I have bytes I can easily
> eyeball Mb and Kbytes. If you exceed the limit of the bytes field, Ztree
> already does the conversion for you to Kbytes.

> Do you care about the impact this might have on performance?

> Surely you can look at just the first 3 and 6 digits and ignore the rest.

> How about a significant/frequently needed "real world" example
> of how mb would displayed would make a difference than having bytes/Kbytes
> displayed. Once a month I like to know if a certain group of files will
> fit on a 700mb CD. I prefer the 1024 byte multiple, so I go to eXecute and
> do "calc xxxxxxxxxxx/1048576=mb (and you can store the value in
> history). or bytes/(1024*1024).

> ../Michael

Impact on performance ?
Absolutely less than negligible. If not actually zero.
There's already a calculation being done to get the KB, whats the difference with getting the MB instead ?
And I have to assume it IS already calculating it since the divider 1000/1024 is selectable in options.


Thread locked

Messages in this Thread

95,607 Postings in 12,059 Threads, 350 registered users, 45 users online (0 registered, 45 guests)
Index | Admin contact |   Forum Time: Oct 18, 2021 - 8:38 pm UTC  |  Hits:43,279,482  (14,118 Today )
RSS Feed